By all accounts, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Rowan Williams is a smart man. But he's also indecisive. Or maybe it's just that he unrealistically wants everything to work out perfectly in an imperfect world. Regardless, there are different kinds of smart, and perhaps the academic kind isn't really the best kind that's suited to the realities of the ambiguous world.
There are three major issues in the news the last few weeks that have dominated the Anglican scene.
- the long-running saga of gay American bishops and Canadian same-sex liturgies.
- the wooing of conservative Anglo-Catholic Anglicans by the Roman Catholic church.
- the "let's kill all the homosexuals" Ugandan legislation.
The first is well documented through the last six years, with endless energy expended on finger-wagging at the Episcopal Church (less so the Anglican Church in Canada). Now that a second openly gay bishop has been elected (not yet confirmed or consecrated, but 99% sure that it will go through), and a woman at that, the finger-wagging and pronouncements of dire consequences have been elevated yet again. (Don't even get me started on the blind eye that is turned to the gay CofE bishops and the "don't ask, don't tell" hypocrisy that exists right under his nose.)
For the second matter, it seems that despite the Archbishop's bending over backwards to accommodate Rome over the years, they feel under no such obligation to reciprocate - catching him entirely by surprise with their offer to take a bunch of priests and parishioners off his hands. Diplomacy and accommodation is nice, but not so great when you get taken advantage of. He's lucky they didn't steal his lunch money too. In his own words to the church:
"I am sorry that there has been no opportunity to alert you earlier to this; I was informed of the planned announcement at a very late stage, and we await the text of the Apostolic Constitution itself and its code of practice in the coming weeks."
Thanks, Pope! You're a pal! Thank you sir, may I have another?
The final matter is the most serious, for the largest number of people, and being the most heinous violation of any kind of universal human rights. And yet this is the one issue where Williams refuses to take a public stand. Oh, he will say that he is negotiating in private, because:
"...speaking out publicly to this effect could indeed, as he says, have
the opposite effect to that intended. It would almost certainly be seen
as white-led colonialism of the worst possible kind, as a misguided
attempt to impose western liberal values upon traditional African
culture." Ruth Gledhill, in her new "suck up to the ABC" mode.
Hmm, as if Africans hadn't killed enough Africans the last few decades. At some point they can't keep blaming it on the after-effects of colonialism.
Let's see his latest pronouncement:
The(event) raises very serious questions not just for the (some) Church and its place in the Anglican Communion, but for the
Communion as a whole.
Guess which event this is about?
Yes, you are indeed correct (sorry, no prizes - it's too easy) - it's the first one - the most minor in the grand scheme of things, but the only one he seems to feel requires an immediate and censorious response.
Thanks for playing, Archbish, but maybe it's time to go back to Hogwarts. I hear the Defense of the Dark Arts position is open again...
Recent Comments